Friday, February 06, 2009

Is Economics a "Science"?

Science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge. This system uses observation and experimentation to describe and explain physical, natural, and societal phenomena.

The methodology employed by economists has a lot in common with that employed by natural scientists. Both attempt to construct theories or models which can then be used to explain and predict.

The scientific approach involves the 4 following steps:
  1. Observation
  2. Reasoning
  3. Formulation of Theory
  4. Testing
In the video shown below from the movie "A Beautiful Mind", you can see part of this scientific approach in use: The scene is set in a bar in which John Nash (played by Russell Crowe) rebutted Adam Smith's idea that, 'the best result comes from everyone in the group doing what's best for himself'. Adam Smith had said: "In competition, individual ambition serves the common good."

But John Nash took an opposing view.

In the movie, he observed what was going on
in the bar, in which it was clear that all his friends had the same idea.. to go straight for a pretty blond girl who had just walked into the place with her other pretty (but not quite as pretty) friends. He related to his friends how they could all score if they all didn't go for the blonde but for her friends instead... He told them that, 'the best result will come where everyone in the group does what is best for himself ... and the group.' He envisioned a scenario -- a bargaining strategy -- in which nobody loses.. Watch how the idea (which was later developed into a theory) was conceived after he carefully observed the scene...

In case you missed the dialogue, here's the transcript:

Nash : Adam Smith needs revision.

Hansen : What are you talking about?

Nash : If we all go for the blonde...we block each other. Not a single one of us is gonna get her. So then we go for her friends, but they will all give us the cold shoulder because nobody likes to be second choice. Well, what if no one goes for the blonde?
We don't get in each other's way, and we don't insult the other girls.
That's the only way we win.
(Laughs)
Adam Smith said the best result comes from everyone in the group doing what's best for himself, right? That's what he said, right?

Others : Right.

Nash : Incomplete.
Incomplete, okay?
Because the best result will come...from everyone in the group doing what's best for himself...and the group.


Hansen : Nash, if this is some way for you to get the blonde on your own, you can go to hell.

Nash: Governing dynamics gentlemen. Governing dynamics. Adam Smith...was wrong.

Nash leaves the bar.


However, unlike natural sciences, economics lacks the ability to make precise predictions with accuracy due to the problems of:
  • Impossible to conduct controlled experiments - Unlike physical and natural scientists who can actually hold other factors constant (in a lab setting) while changing a particular variable, economists deal with a constantly changing environment and complex interactions between individuals, groups and instituitions, etc, resulting in a need to make simplifying assumptions that will frequently not hold true (e.g. assuming "other things remain constant")
  • Human behaviour is unpredictable -although people behave in broadly similar ways under similar conditions (e.g. when price falls, quantity demanded tends to increase), it is impossible to predict this behaviour with any accuracy. For example, factors such as consumer and business confidence are almost impossible to predict with any degree of accuracy.
Related link: Is Economics a Science by Leiter Reports? ; and Is Economics a Science by Greg Mankiw

5 Comments:

Blogger Gavin Kennedy said...

I like your idea for an economics Blog.

However, I am not sure that your take on the Hollywood film which purports to show John Nash putting down Adam Smith is historically accurate. I have explained this on my Blog - its too long to quote: www.adamsmithslostlegacy.com

Adam Smith's views were not well understood by the script writers and modern economists are not much better (few of them have ever read Wealth Of Nations).

I wish your blog well.

10:28 PM  
Blogger Fred said...

This is a childishly false view of science, rejected by _every_ student of science.

Read a book on the philosophy of science, and compare.

2:35 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Awesome things here. I am very satisfied to look your post.
Thank you a lot and I am looking ahead to touch you.
Will you please drop me a mail?

Here is my blog online clock.

8:59 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

www0706
fitflops
mulberry handbags
kate spade outlet
oakley sunglasses
kevin durant jerseys
ralph lauren pas cher
moncler outlet
true religion jeans
air jordan shoes
jazz jerseys


8:53 AM  
Blogger qqqqqq said...

0822jejeDans l'inconvénient, asics running pas cher homme l'Optimus est un petit peu encombrant dans la mesure et ne se sent pas vraiment aussi fort que Air Jordan 30 pas cher d'autres sur cette liste, perdre le coupe-guillotine peut être un problème chaussure nike max hommes 2017 qui compromet l'aspect et la sensation, attention à maintenir ce briquet une asics gel lyte 5 avis seule pièce. La colle est la preuve contre les températures substantielles et air jordan 11 retro low noir rouge vous l'utiliserez dans de grandes températures près de 176 niveaux Fahrenheit. Loup nike air jordan 1 retro high og bg Gris / Noir / Volt, Blanc / Noir, Noir / Blanc / Varsity air jordan 29 Rouge et Noir / Gris foncé / Noir sont tous disponibles à l'achat dès asics gel lyte 3 homme bleu maintenant.

10:45 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home